Doppler effect and energy :: Darkness Embraced

Re: Doppler effect and energy (Score: 1)
by Jacomus (jameshardy26@hotmail.co.uk) on Apr 20, 2006 - 12:46 PM
(User information | Send a message) http://jhardy348.photosite.com

Just a little scientific correction here LoneNights, whilst the change in wavelength of emitted light is due to the Doppler effect, it is called 'Red Shift'. This term describes the way that as light-emitting objects move away from a stationary (or slower moving) point of observation, the wavelength is subject to time-distortion (relative to the observation point). Time distortion is a tricky concept as it only works when observing light waves coming at the observer. If it were possible to selet a single wave, assuming that light is indeed transmitted by waves and not another form that is some kind of cross between photon-stimulation i.e. particulate transmission, and non-interactive wave transmission i.e. the current 'best description' of light transmission. By selecting a single wave of light, if it were possible to freeze its path by stopping time and look at the wave at 90 degrees to its path, it is hypothesised that the wavelength would be concistent along its entire length. It is the effect of time-distortion, which is in effect 'stretching' the wave the further away from its source it gets, that increases its wavelength thereby shifting the colour bias of the light towards the red end of the visible light spectrum. The slightly weak explanation for why time distortion does this is that because humans and animals are subject to the concept of time, and live in a world where the 4th dimension - time, is active, it is our perception of the light wave, filtered as it were, by our perception of the 4th dimension that causes the red-shift.

Phew! That was some taxing stuff - and I sincerely hope that this has been an interesting sideline to your idea. Now a little comment on your idea itself - good one! I am quite scientific by nature, and your idea of energy perception through wave emmision is very interesting indeed. Keep up the mightily cool idea flow. :)

Jacomus

Re: Doppler effect and energy (Score: 1)
by Vicereine_of_Drac (you-dont-need-2-know-just-pm-me@aol.com) on May 21, 2006 - 06:21 PM
(User information | Send a message)

Very interesting theory LoneNights, and glad you added your little part too Jacomus, both were very interesting to read.

Re: Doppler effect and energy (Score: 1)
by Jacomus (jameshardy26@hotmail.co.uk) on Jun 29, 2006 - 09:25 AM
(User information | Send a message) http://jhardy348.photosite.com

I have had a futher thought about this most intriguing topic. I realised that I was caught up in thinking only about the more scientific aspect of the theroy, so I tried to change my focus slightly.

Focus

Looking at the theory of applying Doppler Effect to energy from a more human angle.

Thoughts

As I looked for another direction to think in, I hit upon sight. I began to wonder if the way that we see the world is affected by the energy everything gives off.

Moving away from the Doppler Effect for a time, anaylsing how I saw the world became my priority. I spent countles hours just looking at things happening around me, and come up with nothing. Then I found that I actually was noticing things about how I see, but when I wasn't looking at what was in front of me. I found that after staring at the forest that I can see from a hill in town, when I left to go home my head was buzzing with unfinished thoughts and analysis. I had no time to try and sort any of this out as I was riding, but I tried again when I got home.

Analysis

I have started with the idea that (very simply) our eyes as what make us see and are linked to our brain can be compared to a radar system. At first this doesn't seem totally logical, but I am assuming that the world that we see is distorted and overlayed by the energy it contains and what we see is a picture of both energy and hard substance.

From this premise I extended my thoughts to try and answer how different people notice different aspects of the same environment, and that as vampires more in touch with energy that non-vampires, we notice different aspects completely. I have always had it said about me that I see things others don't, small details, or oddities that are generally overlooked, seen but not recieved.

I propose that our own human 'radar' systems are all tuned differently, and those of vampires and people in touch with energy as a tangible thing, are tuned more sensitively - allowing us to see deeper into our environment than others. For example I do things like watch the shadow of a bird passing overhead instead of the bird, but know where the bird is.

Conclusion

I have arrived at the idea that the energy picture of our environment that we see is a constant broadcast from the environment, and it is the different sensitivities of our individual 'radars' that let us see different aspects. Returning to the way I will follow a bird's shadow not the bird, I believe that this could be my 'radar' noticing either an absense of energy, or a different energy pattern and telling my eyes to look at it, to try and get a visual answer to the anomoly. Naturally my brain, when my eyes see the shadow, will tell me that it is a shadow, an absence of light caused by the bird being between the surface and the sun. I have begun to think that perhaps this kind of conditioned 'knowlege' is in fact stopping me from seeing what is really there. It is a difficult question to grapple with, and is taking up vast amounts of of my energy at the moment, trying to reject my 'knowlege' of what I see, and see beyond it. I am having little sucess, but I will keep this thread updated whenever I have new thoughts and ideas about this.

Jacomus